AE AT WORK
Understand what helps your organisation change
Why does a problem keep returning? Why does feedback lead to a report but no change? EdgeLab uses research to explore how work gets done, what makes decisions possible and where a different approach could help.
We welcome questions from businesses, public services, healthcare, charities, education, cultural organisations and community groups. You can start with a practical problem; no knowledge of AE is needed.
Explore three worked examples · Discuss an organisational challenge
Three ways to look at a problem
Autopoietic ecology (AE) looks at what makes people and organisations able to act. Choose a question below to explore understanding, decisions or the resources people need. More than one may apply.
MEANING
Are people understanding the same thing?
Follow what changes when someone’s experience becomes a report, a number or an AI summary.
See an example and questions
Start here: take one important claim and compare how different people interpret it. Follow what is retained, omitted or reclassified as it moves into a decision.
Possible next step: review a small sample of accounts and decisions together. Explore the information-and-decisions example.
AUTHORITY
Can concerns change a decision?
Explore who can question, revise or stop an action, and what resources they need.
See an example and questions
Start here: follow one recognised concern to the next relevant decision. Identify who has responsibility, authority and practical means to respond.
Possible next step: agree a response route and review whether it changes what happens. Explore the participation example.
CAPACITY
What is the work doing to people and resources?
Ask what people need to do the work, and whether doing it builds or uses up those resources.
See an example and questions
Start here: follow a piece of work across teams, including informal checking, waiting, learning and repair. Ask who carries effort that the usual measures miss.
Possible next step: examine one handover or allocation with the people affected. Explore the workload example.
Use these questions to start a discussion. Understanding a particular organisation also needs evidence, relevant experience and a willingness to consider other explanations.
Take an organisational question into the AE Engine
Start with one decision, handover or recurring difficulty. Copy and adapt this prompt, then explore it in ChatGPT.
Show an organisational inquiry prompt
“A recurring problem in our organisation is [describe the situation]. Ask me for a specific example. Help me examine how people understand it, who can influence a decision and who carries the work. Separate evidence from assumptions, consider another explanation and suggest a small change we could evaluate.”
Opens in a new tab; ChatGPT sign-in is required. This is an experimental research tool. Check its suggestions against evidence. About the engine.
Three situations you may recognise
Illustrative scenarios. These are constructed examples of how an inquiry could work. The interventions and outcomes described are proposals to investigate, rather than results from completed EdgeLab projects.
Information and decisions · Workload and performance · Participation and change
01 · DECISIONS AND LEARNING
When information becomes a decision
A service team uses AI to summarise enquiries. A tentative statement becomes a confident summary, which a colleague treats as a confirmed fact. Faster handling may coexist with misunderstanding.
Where this applies: customer service, public administration and professional work. A related educational question is whether an AI-assisted answer develops a learner’s understanding.
Follow the inquiry and test a change
Trace the change: compare the original account, summary, judgement and resulting action. Ask what was omitted, what staff understood and when the summary acquired authority.
Possible intervention: keep uncertainty visible, give reviewers access to the source and specify who can correct the record and pause the resulting action. Test whether staff can explain and challenge a recommendation.
Evidence to examine: total handling time, material errors, correction effort, unresolved enquiries and the quality of staff explanations. Compare with the previous process and investigate alternatives such as unclear guidance or insufficient training.
Explore semantic transduction · Read the working paper and its constructed educational case
02 · WORKLOAD AND PERFORMANCE
When meeting targets creates hidden work
A team consistently meets its deadlines because staff resolve handover problems informally and another department absorbs repeated corrections. The reported success can conceal the effort required to produce it.
Where this applies: manufacturing, logistics, professional services, healthcare administration and university operations.
Follow the inquiry and test a change
Trace the dependencies: follow a piece of work across teams, including checking, waiting, rework and deferred maintenance. Establish whose effort is recorded and whether their experience informs the next allocation.
Possible intervention: change one handover, approval rule or allocation process, with the teams affected helping to design it. Make time for learning a more workable practice.
Evidence to examine: end-to-end completion, rework, overtime, service quality and effects on other teams. Check whether any improvement persists and whether burdens have simply moved. Consider demand fluctuations, staffing and skill gaps as alternative explanations.
Explore the consultancy approach · See current writing on organisational burdens
03 · PARTICIPATION AND CHANGE
When listening needs a route to action
An organisation gathers thoughtful feedback from staff, members or service users. The report is discussed, but the next budget or service decision follows the same routine. Participants cannot see what their contribution changed.
Where this applies: charities, local government, membership bodies, cultural organisations, community groups and employee participation.
Follow the inquiry and test a change
Trace a contribution: follow one concern from the person raising it through its interpretation, recording and consideration. Identify the decision, resources and authority needed to respond.
Possible intervention: agree a response route with named responsibility, access to the relevant decision and a review date. Give participants a way to question how their concern has been represented.
Evidence to examine: whose contributions reach decisions, what changes, how reasons are communicated and whether people can challenge the response. Examine resource limits and competing needs; participation does not guarantee that every request can be met.
Explore meaning mediation · Read about the related civic-learning questions in I-CIVIC
Start with one activity that matters
An initial conversation can identify a useful starting point: an exploratory workshop, a focused organisational inquiry or the design and evaluation of a small pilot. Scope, responsibilities, access and deliverables are agreed for each engagement.
- Define the purpose. Agree what people should become able to do, whose experience matters and how progress would be recognised.
- Follow the activity. Use suitable interviews, observation, documents and operational evidence to examine decisions and dependencies.
- Test a focused change. Establish a baseline, consider alternative explanations and agree when to continue, revise or stop.
- Review what becomes possible. Examine service outcomes alongside learning, workload, participation and the capacity to respond again.
Depending on the question, an engagement could produce a map of critical dependencies, an evidence-based account of a recurring problem, a pilot and evaluation plan, or agreed arrangements for reviewing decisions.
The inquiry must fit the organisation’s purpose, scale, professional obligations and resources. AE is a developing framework: its additional value needs to be demonstrated in the setting being studied.
Bring your setting and your question
EdgeLab contributes independent research and development. Its relationship with Cambridge Global Knowledge Nexus (CGKN) connects this work with consultancy and training.
Discuss research or an organisational question with Steven Watson · Contact CGKN about consultancy and training
Ways to work with us · AE and consultancy · Research programme · Publications and evidence
For the intellectual background, explore the AE overview and its engagement with other scholarship.
Cambridge EdgeLab 