Research and Scholarship

Reviews

Critical readings of books, research papers and essays.

What authors say

Authors’ responses help us develop the conversation beyond a review. These comments are shared with permission.

“Engaging with a deep critical reading of the article helped me see more clearly where the empirical work needs to go next.”

Oğuz Kaan Pehlivan, author of Autopoiesis and the Limits of Closure in International Law.
Read the review and author’s response.

“We also found your broader interpretation of the distinction between support and observable organisational commitments very stimulating and relevant for future research.”

Joana Carneiro Pinto, co-author of The rise of AI in the workplace.
Read the review.

“We found that it captures our findings and thoughts very well.”

Tracy Zou, co-author with Jodie Chen of Students’ agency in GenAI-mediated group assessment: an ecological-emergent perspective, responding to EdgeLab’s review. Shared with permission.
Read the review.

Find a review or essay

Choose a subject and article format, then add a keyword or an author’s name if you wish. Results stay within Research and Scholarship.

All research · All reviews · Jump to articles

Browse by format

Browse all subjects
Understanding the review labels

Research paper reviews discuss studies and theoretical or methodological papers. Book reviews cover books and edited collections. Essay and report reviews engage public scholarship. Essays and explainers develop EdgeLab’s own arguments and research reflections.

Preliminary reading means access to the source was limited. Preprint identifies a manuscript discussed before its peer-reviewed publication was established. Each article explains its source, evidence and limitations; a format category is not a peer-review claim.

Research posts: Reviews

View all Research and Scholarship posts · Subscribe free